War on terror: Will Trump’s administration use NDAA to go after George Soros for domestic terrorism?
Most Americans seem to know about Al Qaeda and ISIS, but very few might grasp the concept of domestic terrorism in the ideological ‘War on Terror’. ¬†And while the term terrorism can and is often used ambiguously by the media and by politicians, the core definition is fairly black and white.
Terrorism:¬†the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
Domestic terrorism is the use of violence and intimidation to pursue political aims in one’s particular homeland, and in America’s history it has included at times both citizens and government officials committing these activities. ¬†During the 1950’s local law enforcement, such as with Sheriff Bull Connor in Birmingham, Alabama, used violence and intimidation against the civil rights of black protesters in order to protect the status quo of Jim Crow laws. ¬†In the 1960’s and 70’s, civilian organizations like the Weather Underground also used violence but against the government to further their political goals for change.
Yet it wasn’t until 9/11 2001 that an official stance by the U.S. government was forged to fight against terrorism, both foreign and domestic, but with most of the laws being created over the past two decades used to undermine the American people through a suspension of Constitutional rights, and a crackdown on economic freedoms.
Unfortunately for most Americans since 9/11, the government has sought to pick and choose where laws such as the Patriot Act and NDAA were to be enforced, and quite often they have actually turned them on innocent people while at the same time ignoring them when it came to supporting foreign terrorism in places like Benghazi, Syria, and Ukraine.
The conclusion that the Citizens‚Äô Commission on Benghazi came to:
‚ÄúThe Citizen‚Äôs Commission on Benghazi‚Äôs interim report, in a paragraph titled ‚ÄúChanging sides in the War on Terror,‚ÄĚ alleges ‚Äúthe U.S. was fully aware of and facilitating the delivery of weapons to the Al Qaeda-dominated rebel militias throughout the 2011 rebellion.‚ÄĚ
The report asserted the jihadist agenda of AQIM, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group and other Islamic terror groups represented among the rebel forces was well known to U.S. officials responsible for Libya policy.
‚ÄúThe rebels made no secret of their Al Qaeda affiliation, openly flying and speaking in front of the black flag of Islamic jihad, according to author John Rosenthal and multiple media reports,‚ÄĚ the interim report said. ‚ÄúAnd yet, the White House and senior Congressional members deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy that provided material support to terrorist organizations in order to topple a ruler who had been working closely with the West actively to suppress Al Qaeda.‚ÄĚ‚ÄĚ – Government Denies Knowledge
Following the rejection of America’s establishment oligarchy last Tuesday, a new opportunity is dawning where the sins of our political fathers could potentially be erased, and law enforcement could once again be focused on those who actually commit criminal activity such as terrorism. ¬†But the real question is whether Donald Trump, Congress, and his new administration have the stomach to engage in a full scale war on Domestic terror by going after the groups, and in particular the one individual, who has been funding domestic terror now for the past two years?
Billionaire Globalist Soros Exposed as Hidden Hand Behind Trump Protests ‚ÄĒ Provoking US ‚ÄėColor Revolution‚Äô ¬†‚Ä¶ Billionaire globalist financier George Soros‚Äô MoveOn.org has been revealed to be a driving force behind the organizing of nationwide protests against the election of Donald Trump ‚ÄĒ exposing the protests to largely be an organized, top-down operation ‚ÄĒ and not an organic movement of concerned Americans taking to the streets as reported by the mainstream media. -Free Thought Project
Beginning in Baltimore last year, or perhaps even as far back as the Ferguson, MO riots, George Soros has intentionally pushed for, and funded violent acts against Americans through paid protests using dozens of shell companies. ¬†And ever since Hillary Clinton signaled on Wednesday her support of a new ‘Color Revolution’ through her and Bill’s wearing of purple during her concession speech, American cities have been under siege by paid activists who seek to overthrow the Constitution and bring about political change through the use of intimidation and violence.
Here is a picture of blocks of buses hired by shell companies to bring in paid protesters to incite violence and intimidation against Donald Trump and anyone who supported him.
The fact of the matter is, America is either fighting a war against terror… all terror, or the trillions of dollars we have spent over the past 15 years have been itself a political agenda meant to tear down the fabric of our society. ¬†And it would not be surprising if a large portion of the terrorism we currently see around the world would quickly dry up if the government chose to arrest George Soros, seize all his assets and companies aiding and abetting terrorism, as use this simple act as a means of deterring others from trying to make political change through the use of terror and violence.
Kenneth Schortgen Jr¬†is¬†a writer for The Daily Economist, Secretsofthefed.com,¬†Roguemoney.net, and Viral Liberty, and hosts¬†the popular youtube podcast on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays.¬†Ken can also¬†be heard Wednesday afternoons giving an weekly economic report on the¬†Angel Clark radio show.